Did Neanderthals Go Extinct Because of the Size of Their Brains?

Using computers and MRI scan , research worker have created the most detailed reconstruction of a Neanderthal brain to date , offering unexampled insights into the social and cognitive ability of these extinct humankind . But as to whether these characteristics were creditworthy for their ultimate demise stay on an open question .

Newresearchpublished today in Scientific Reports suggests authoritative differences in cognitive and neural function between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals go to differences in behavior that may have resulted in the experimental condition under which anatomically modern humans succeeded and Neanderthals failed some 45,000 years ago . To hit this conclusion — and in one of the first subject of its kind — scientist conducted a comparative analysis of oafish and former forward-looking human skull to infer mastermind subroutine . But because no other archaeological evidence was provided to bolster up the case , and because the anatomy and size of it of mind can not be definitively tie to cognitive capacitance and demeanor , the doubt of what caused loutish extinction remains very much unsettled .

The history of the Neanderthals has puzzled archaeologists and anthropologist ever since the first skeleton in the closet of this mintage was uncovered in 1829 . Despite years of enquiry and speculation , we ’re still not trusted what went wrong for the Neanderthals , who last in Europe and Asia for a whopping 200,000 years , much of it during the Ice Age . At the same time , scientist are n’t entirely sure what go right-hand for Homo sapiens . So when it comes to explaining their nonstarter and our success , it ’s fair to ask : What were the difference that made the difference ?

Argentina’s President Javier Milei (left) and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., holding a chainsaw in a photo posted to Kennedy’s X account on May 27. 2025.

Perhaps there were differences in how the two species were able to adapt to speedily changing climatic and environmental status . Or maybe it had to do with differences in technical , social , and economic systems , or differences in scrounge and hunt strategy . It ’s potential that Neanderthals had inferior or limited communication skills , or that Neanderthals were either absorbed or wipe out by early modern humans . These possibility are all fascinating and provocative in their own rightfulness , but the ultimate reason remains unreadable .

The approximation that behavioral divergence may have had something to do with it , however , is not outlandish . Working under the Assumption of Mary that demeanor is a function of cognitive and neurologic capacities , a team of researchers led by Naomichi Ogihara from Keio University in Japan set out to model the brains of Neanderthals , other anatomically mod humans , and living man to infer possible functional difference between the two . Prior to this oeuvre , scientists had analyzed the differences between Neanderthal and modern human brains , but this is the first subject field to reconstruct brains for the purpose of necessitate possible functional differences .

Indeed , though scientist have many Neanderthal skull to work with , none of them incorporate actual brains , making it difficult to know what the inside of their heads actually seem like . The next ripe choice , therefore , is to look at their fossilized skull and essay to figure out the shape , size of it , and orientation of the Neanderthal brain .

William Duplessie

To do this , Ogihara ’s team created virtual three - dimensional “ plaster cast ” of brains using data point derive from the skulls of four Neanderthals and four early modern mankind ( the skull used in the subject area go steady from between 135,000 and 32,000 years ago ) . This allowed the researchers to restore and visualize the 3D structure of the brainpower ’s gray and white thing regions , along with the cerebrospinal fluid regions . Then , using a large dataset from the Human Connectome Project , specifically MRI brain scans take of more than 1,180 individuals , the investigator modeled the “ medium ” human head to provide a kind of baseline for the study and allow for the relative analysis .

Using this method acting , the researchers uncovered “ meaning ” differences in brain syllable structure . Even though Neanderthals had larger skull , and thus big mental capacity bulk overall , H. sapiens had a proportionately larger cerebellum , the part of genius involved in movement , rest , vision , learning , oral communication , and humor . Modern humanity also sport a belittled occipital part in the cerebrum , which is tie to visual sense . Looking at these differences , the researchers generalize such abilities as cognitive flexibility ( i.e. erudition , adaptability , and out - of - the - box thought ) , care , language processing , and short - term and long - term memory . human being sapiens , the research worker concluded , had better cognitive and social ability than Neanderthals , and a greater mental ability for long - term retention and speech processing .

“ This team has found significant difference between loutish brain and innovative human wit , specifically in brain domain we consociate today with human capacities for linguistic communication , societal cooperation , and memory mental ability , ” Lana Ruck , a doctorial bookman in the Cognitive Science Program at the Department of Anthropology at Indiana University , enjoin Gizmodo . “ Because these are all very adaptive behaviors which have expanded in humans relative to other species today , it is interesting to consider how these mastermind areas differed between the hominins . ”

Starship Test 9

Ruck , who was n’t involved in the new study , enjoin this is specially interesting in the case of the Neanderthals , because the two species actually interact with with each other on the landscape , and because differences in knowledge are a big surmise for why the Neanderthals went extinct , but Homo sapiens did not . As the researchers concluded in the study :

Thus , the differences in neuroanatomic system of the cerebellum may have result in a decisive conflict in cognitive and societal ability between the two species . Consequently , power to adapt to changing environment by creating institution may have been set in [ Neanderthals ] and this difference possibly affected their chance of survival and drove the replacement outgrowth .

Neuroscientist Kari L. Allen , an assistant prof at Washington University ’s School of Medicine in St. Louis , said the new paper is an intriguing stride forward in terms of incorporating our knowledge of modern brain function into fossil analyses . But she aver more work on the connection between brain sizing , condition , and role is required before we can confidently interpret the evolutionary impact of these differences between Neanderthals and humans .

Lilo And Stitch 2025

“ The authors bank on the premise that bigger is better and that shape of the brain airfoil can be used to interpret the sizing of wit ingredient , ” Allen told Gizmodo . “ One thing to keep in nous is that the overall pattern of brain is almost certainly a compromise of multiple factors and some of these are likely to have minuscule shock on cognition . For example , brain size and shape is to some grade constrained by eubstance sizing and the size and shape of the facial skeleton . So the connection between shape and cognition is difficult to assess . ”

Indeed , the whimsey that we can extrapolate cognitive capacities and demeanor by mould the shape of encephalon in a computer is a thin proposition at advantageously .

“ This is in all likelihood the most important question here , because it ’s a very litigious topic in the field today : What can you tell about a metal money ’ cognitive capacity if you only have their brains or skulls ? ” take Ruck . “ Although the generator take that cerebellar volume correlates with increased executive functions , including attention , inhibition , speech inclusion and output , and working memory , this does not necessarily correspond to deficits in human subjects with smaller cerebellums in their sample , since the Human Connectome Data is of respectable adult . ”

CMF by Nothing Phone 2 Pro has an Essential Key that’s an AI button

By the same token , Ruck said it may be a stretch to posit that small cerebellums and reduced social and linguistic capacity in Neanderthals had damaging consequences for the natural selection of the coinage . These shortcomings aside , Ruck tell the newfangled cogitation is one of the very earliest attack to predict wit surface and anatomy of nonextant human ancestors like a shot from 3D figurer models , “ so in that sense , it ’s significant . ”

https://gizmodo.com/neanderthals-with-disabilities-survived-through-social-1819801216

As a last note , it ’s of import to indicate out that brain social occasion and intelligence activity are almost always a very small part of the story . modernistic culture emphasizes — and even fetishises — intelligence , so it ’s no surprise that some scientist attribute it to the winner of former modern humanity . But an psychoanalysis like this one does n’t severalise us anything about the culture , oral tradition , and social networks that may have helped Neanderthals make up for any cognitive “ deficiencies ” compared to H. sapiens . At the same metre , this study on its own can not say us if these dispute had anything to do with Neanderthalian defunctness . Without more information , such as archaeologic or hereditary evidence , the question of Neanderthal extinction remains undetermined .

Photo: Jae C. Hong