Meta ’s own policy around fact - checking political candidates may be pigeonholing them into hosting a groundswell of new , immaculate Donald Trump - authored ravings .
The former United States President officially announced his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election on Tuesday eventide in front of a raucous bunch at his Mar - a - Lago estate . That single act of officially declaring his re - election bid triggersMeta policiespreventing the company ’s third party fact - checkers from interfere on pol ’ posts . And even though Trump himself remains banned on most major political platform , the fact - checking ban still give to content crafted by him that ’s then shared by others on the platform , according toa caller wide memo obtained by CNN .
“ If former president Trump makes a vindicated , public promulgation that he is running for office , he would be believe a pol under our program policies , ” the memo reportedly reads .
Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, on 25 January 2025. - Donald Trump pulled the trigger on a third White House run on November 15.Photo: Alon Skuy (Getty Images)
That memo served as a reminder to the companionship ’s fact - checkers — some of whom had requested direction in the lead of the Trump announcement — that they can not apply misinformation labels to Trump ’s original content . The rule , importantly , does n’t just apply to Trump but includes all political figures . Still , the former president ’s infamous report as aleading propagator of blatantly faux bullshitreportedly led a manager on Meta ’s “ news program integrity partnership ” team to send out the email to fact - checkers reminding them of their new limitation .
“ Political words is ineligible for fact - checking , ” the manager said fit in to CNN . “ We delineate a ‘ political leader ’ as prospect run for agency , current post holders — and , by extension , many of their storage locker appointees — along with political parties and their drawing card . ”
Types of political oral communication ineligible for fact checking , the memorandum noted , let in their run-in spoken or write as well as photograph , video , or , “ other substance that is clearly labeled as create by the politician or their campaign . ” As with many of Meta ’s message moderation policies though , there are some caveats . While the company ’s platforms wo n’t post political leader ’ organic content or ads ( mean things they themselves post ) to their fact - checker , they are willing todemote“previously expose ” content share by those politicians .
Meta slump to remark on the memo .
It ’s during time like these where an mediocre person might genuinely wonder why Meta ’s fact - checking setup does n’t implement to politicians in the first place . Meta’spoint of view , which it ’s maintained since at least 2019 , is that it simply should n’t be the one vocation chunk and strikes on political matters . Fact - checking politicians , they say , would potentially put them in the uncomfortable location of conquer political speech , something a mouthy faction of Republican lawmakers alreadyregularly accusethem of doing .
“ To utilize tennis as an analogy , our caper is to check that the court is quick — the control surface is flat , the lines paint , the connection at the right height , ” Meta President of Global AffairsNick Cleggsaid during a 2019 delivery . “ But we do n’t blame up a illegitimate enterprise and start playing . How the players play the plot is up to them , not us . ”
“ At Facebook , our role is to verify there is a point acting subject area , not to be a political player ourselves , ” Clegg add .
On the other hand , subject matter moderation researchers and some Meta fact - checker have spoken out critically against the political fact - hold back proscription with a few even calling on the company to kill the pattern . In the worst cases , fact - checkers like PolitiFact Executive Director Aaron Sharockman warn eager lie spreader and the true distorters could plainly set in motion a feigned bid for president or other elect offices as a loose cover to skirt around the society fact - contain protections .
“ Facebook has to remove the exemption for politicians or they risk Trump ( or others ) filing to run for office entirely for the function of publication unfiltered on Facebook , ” Sharockman wrote .
IMO , Facebook has to take the exemption for politicians or they risk Trump ( or others ) filing to work for berth solely for the purpose of publishing unfiltered on Facebook . Would n’t weigh whether he wrap up running or not .
— Aaron Sharockman ( @asharock)May 5 , 2021
Other researcher , like University of Wisconsin - Madison news media professor Lucas Graves have summon enquiry suggesting political figure themselves are often significant driver of potentially misleading information on platforms that can make a “ climate of doubt . ”
“ It ’s not just a enquiry of elaboration , ” Graves said in aninterviewwith Poynter . “ It ’s the question of making it relevant to new political context helping to translate it for a given second . ”
The dissents are n’t limited to outside origin either . legion Facebook employee writing in internal troupe document viewed by Gizmodo as part ofThe Facebook Papersshow repeated inquiring of the company ’s complex decision - making regarding fact - checking . That discrepancy applies to fact - checking decisions around political bod but also numerous other areas rate from covid-19 half truths toclimate change misinformation .
Update , 12:37 : add reply from Meta .
Donald TrumpFacebookFact - checking
Daily Newsletter
Get the skilful tech , science , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
newsworthiness from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
